01.17.2003 || 00h42

The last few thoughts on the same goddamned theme

I've decided that I can now get my license. What I've been waiting for is practically upon us, and is kinda cute to boot. So yeah, I'm going to call up the r�gie next week.

**********

You know, I've been re-thinking my approach to the whole kiddie-porn thing. Not so much changing my position as sort of asking a few questions, I guess. I mean, I still don't think that someone who looks at dirty pictures of children is inherently dangerous, but I d*do* find the whole idea to reek of sketch. I mean, I find it weird that anyone would find chidlers attractive. I don't understand it, and I don't want to. I refuse to believe that just because I hate the idea of something, it's wrong or should be illegal. Of course, at the heart of kiddie porn lies the monster of its nature: there are children in this world who are being used for this.

I guess it's sort of the same thing as the argument for decriminalising pot or other soft drugs: Technically, the end user is an enabler for the industry, right? So punishing the dealer while letting his customers off makes no sense. I'm seeing the whole kiddie-porn industry in the same light.

Yes, I still believe that what goes on in one's bedroom is one's own business. I don't know how to make that work with my history and with those who would do the same to other kids. I don't see the geek looking at the dirty pictures as an automatic predator, but in my opinion, whoever took the pictures most certainly is.



||Gods save the Queen,
||cf

back || forth

older shite

One last little note... - 09.21.2006

de-stressing, biking and terrorism - 06.06.2006

Mildly stressed... - 05.29.2006

More crime stupidity - 05.28.2006

Scary stuff - 05.25.2006



diaryland.com
Oh yeah, the page and everything
on it is �2000 - 2005 to me, alright ?
don't copy without asking.

Original �reation 2005